Comments on: The Imperial Palace http://www.eddiewong.net/2006/11/24/the-imperial-palace/ ... da sexiest of sexy designers in Tokyo Wed, 28 Jul 2010 14:41:00 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0 By: eddie http://www.eddiewong.net/2006/11/24/the-imperial-palace/comment-page-1/#comment-735 eddie Mon, 27 Nov 2006 04:34:25 +0000 http://www.eddiewong.net/2006/11/24/the-imperial-palace/#comment-735 Hey Richard, I've recovered, thanks. Yeah, the images are not so noisey especially when they are that small. The pics are also over exposed. Your Canons should be much better at handling noise. Thats not a building, its just a monument of something depicting a pine tree (forgot the details). Hey Richard, I’ve recovered, thanks.

Yeah, the images are not so noisey especially when they are that small. The pics are also over exposed. Your Canons should be much better at handling noise.

Thats not a building, its just a monument of something depicting a pine tree (forgot the details).

]]> By: Richard Kang http://www.eddiewong.net/2006/11/24/the-imperial-palace/comment-page-1/#comment-733 Richard Kang Mon, 27 Nov 2006 03:41:06 +0000 http://www.eddiewong.net/2006/11/24/the-imperial-palace/#comment-733 Even though your shots were on 1600, they are not as 'noisy'. Were the originals very over-exposed? What's that modern building with a ring at the top of the building (the 6th image)? Even though your shots were on 1600, they are not as ‘noisy’. Were the originals very over-exposed? What’s that modern building with a ring at the top of the building (the 6th image)?

]]>